RULE FOR 25% COMMERCIAL APPROVAL IN HUDA OR TOWN PLANNING TCP HARYANA

TOWN PLANNING TCP HARYANA

Town Planning TCP , Reference is drawn towards the notice dated 06.02.2008 gave by this
Office, with respect to consent for non-irritation proficient consultancy administrations such
as Specialists (without nursing home), Attorneys, Expense Experts, Draftsmen and Town Organizers
(without studio), Worker for hire Experts, Contracted Bookkeepers, Organization Secretaries,
Property Advisors, Ayurvedic and Homeopathic Expert, Specialist, Clinical
Analyst and Local escorts. These exercises are allowed to the degree of 25% of the
developed region of the structure or up to 50 sq. miter, whichever is less in Private Plots. The
same was subsequently consolidated in Part 6 of Haryana Construction regulation 2017 (HBC).
While, it has been seen that the overall population isn’t greatly familiar
with the said guidance/arrangements of HBC-2017 and keeping in mind that making a move against such
infringement in neighborhoods, the violators are not made mindful of similar by the field workplaces.
Appropriately, to resolve this issue, it is therefore requested that all DTPs in their
separate Locale will guarantee that the overall population is sharpened about the guidelines,
so they might apply for earlier authorizations according to arrangements of HBC-2017.

DATED :- 18/08/2023                                                                      End St. No. Misc-2339 (Free Vol-I)/2023/27089-91

 

Our other social links

Instagram 

other blogs and works

construction-materials

Vaastu-shastra

 

BBS

What is the Bar Bending Schedule (BBS) of TMT Bar

What is the Bar Bending Schedule (BBS) of TMT Bar?

Building a home requires a few variables to be thought about to obtain the best outcome. Before you start the development of your home you really want to have the ideal preparation, exact assessment and best quality structure materials and BBS

In development, TMT Bar is one of the superb materials that make your home

Heat proof
Seismic tremor Safe

Consequently, it is fundamental to pick the best quality TMT Bar that has the ideal equilibrium of solidarity and adaptability and makes your home never-ending. TMT Bars are generally utilized for their flexibility and bendability. TMT Bar is a cutting edge innovation that is utilized in a wide range of development. The Thermo Mechanical Treatment brings about areas of strength for a martensite layer on the external side that outcomes in the rigidity to it and the delicate ferrite-pearlite internal center makes it exceptionally malleable. TMT Bars are notable for their bendability.

Here we will examine the Bar Bowing Timetable (BBS) that will assist with improving on the steel bar assessment for development and benefit of it.

Bar Bowing Timetable or Timetable of Bar is performed relying on the supported substantial work thing. Bar twisting plan sums up each of the needed specifics of bars – measurement, the state of bowing, length of each and every bowed and straight part, points of twisting, the general length of each and every bar, and the quantity of each kind of bar. This reality is a choice help with setting up a gauge of amounts.

 

BBS

What is Bar Bowing Timetable?

Estimation of the all out amount of TMT Steel Bar expected for building development is named a Bar Twisting Timetable. Steel Bar support in substantial designs in this way the development construction can endure the strain. How much is TMT Bar expected to develop your home? What sort of steel bar is best for development? The amount TMT Bar is expected in RCC? This large number of inquiries can be served during Bar Twisting Timetable (BBS).

Adjustment in Bar Twisting Timetables

The development business quickly different over the most recent couple of many years. Already three to four-story structures were viewed as skyscraper however with the quick development in the development business, we could see 100+ story structures all the time.

As per the old development strategy utilizing four steel bars in a segment was standard yet presently we are utilizing 15+ steel bars in the line in light of burden examination. The ascent in total populace requested more spaces in little regions.

Bar Bending Schedule (BBS)

Learning the rudiments prior to managing BBS is significant

Particular                                                                      Result

Standard Length of TMT Steel Bar =                             12M or 40’
Weight of bar for length                    =                             1m (Dia of Bar)*2/162
Steel Density                                        =                             7850 Kg/m3

Significant focuses to be noted for Bar Bowing Timetable

  1.  TMT Steel Bars ought to be held together in a gathering that can be distinguished for each underlying unit and the rundown ought to be very much circulated for each floor
  2. Bars ought to be in numeric request numbers
  3.  Each bar in the group ought to be named appropriately with the length, size and state of the bar
  4.  In the bar bowing cutting timetable cutting length and twisting length estimation ought to be done independently.
    Significant Use of Bar Twisting Timetable

 

Significant Use of Bar Twisting Timetable

  1. Bar Bowing Timetable (BBS) assists with deciding the amount of steel expected in the development of your home. This assists with getting a precise assessment of steel
    2. When the computation of cutting and twisting is done it lessens the wastage of steel and it becomes monetary
    3. When you get the support drawings, cutting and twisting should be possible at the stockroom before transportation. It speeds up development and the transportation cost additionally lessens.
    4. Prior to putting the substantial assuming that the twisting and cutting length of TMT Steel bars are estimated it becomes more straightforward for site engineers.

 

Our other social links

Instagram 

other blogs and works

construction-materials

Vaastu-shastra

 

What are Stirrups in RCC and Types of Stirrups ?

What are Stirrups in RCC?

We have alluded to this as equal ties during our examinations. Stirrups are closed circle bars connected at common traverses in point of support backing to stand firm on the bars in circumstance.
Flat ties are used to stand firm on the balance of the help in a section without disturbing the significant space. Both are something almost identical and simply shift from their circumstance.
If it is placed in a segment it is known as equal ties. If it is set in a point of support it is known as stirrups. The components of both differentiation for point of support and area.
Generally the stirrups are arranged in a rectangular or square shape yet on occasion, it may be given in indirect or slantingly.

Why are the Stirrups & Ties provided in Beam and Column reinforcement?

It stands firm on the rebars in circumstance and thwarts deformation. It positions the posts in a comparative alignment. To secure the bar and portion from the catching and shear disillusionment.
The stirrups are contradicting the bars under tension or versatile force.The isolating of stirrups will be different considering the arrangement for both segment and bar.
The base separating is 100mm and the best is 250mm, considering the estimation and amounts of the bar.

Types of Stirrups

The going with sorts of stirrups are by and large used in help and in a couple of outstanding cases the designer changes the stirrups considering the arrangement essential.

Single Legged Stirrups (Open Stirrup)
Two-Legged or Double legged Stirrups (Closed)
Four-Legged Stirrups (Closed)
Six-Legged Stirrups (Closed)
Circular Stirrups (Open Stirrup)
Helical Stirrups (Open Stirrup)

Single Legged Stirrups

Single-leg stirrups have only occasionally been used considering the way that they are by and large used while limiting only two shafts.

Single Legged Stirrups

Single Legged Stirrups

Two-Legged Stirrups

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary and comprehensively using stirrup type id Two-legged stirrups. To provide this stirrup with a base 4 number of the shaft is required.

Single Legged Stirrups

Single Legged Stirrups

Four Legged Stirrups

Single Legged Stirrups

Single Legged Stirrups

Six Legged Stirrups

Single Legged Stirrups

Single Legged Stirrups

Circular Stirrups

Circular stirrup is used when the part is a round shape.

Circular Stirrups

Circular Stirrups

Helical Stirrups

By and large it is used in load sections and moreover for the pile foundation the stirrup can use either Helical or indirect.

Helical Stirrups

Helical Stirrups

Lateral Ties

These types of lateral ties have been used when the number of rods was increased.

Such equal ties have been used when the amount of shafts was extended.

Lateral Ties

Lateral Ties

Ties for 4 Bars

Lateral Ties for 4 Bars

4 Bars

Lateral 8 Bars

Lateral Ties for 8 Bars

Lateral  8 Bars

Lateral Ties for 10 Bars

Lateral Ties for 10 Bars

Ties for 10 Bars

 

Our other social links

Instagram 

other blogs and works

construction-materials

Vaastu-shastra

Chandigarh secretariat ,history, master plan

Chandigarh secretariat ,history, master plan

Chandigarh

Chandigarh, Chandigarh secretariat ,history, master plan the fantasy city of India’s most memorable Top state leader, Sh. Jawahar Lal Nehru was arranged by the well known French modeler Le Corbusier. Beautifully situated at the lower regions of Shavlik’s, it is known as perhaps of the best examination in metropolitan preparation and current design in the 20th hundred years in India. Chandigarh became representative of the recently autonomous India. The establishment stone of the city was laid in 1952. The city is notable for its engineering and plan by draftsmen like Le Corbusier, Pierre Jeanerette, Jane Drew, and Maxwell Fry.

History:-

Chandigarh secretariat ,history, master plan

During the 50s Le Corbusier was approached to foster the arrangement of Albert Mayer. Mayer began a few years before with the principal Ground breaking strategy for Chandigarh and gotten the Clean conceived American planner Matthew Novicki, who passed on in a plane accident in 1950. The public authority officials of Punjab jumping all over the chance to track down another group of engineers and town organizers.

Le Corbusier was utilized for the All-inclusive strategy and the Capital structures and worked from 1951 until his passing in 1965 on the development of the city. Pierre Jeanerette, his cousin and accomplice was employed as the site planner. Maxwell Fry and Jane B. Drew worked for around three years on the undertaking and afterward left because of their commitment somewhere else. In 1965 M.N. Sharma took over from Pierre Jeanerette as the primary Indian Boss Engineer of the Venture and after the rearrangement of the Province of Punjab in 1966 and the foundation of Association Region, Chandigarh, he was designated as Regulatory Secretary of the Branch of Design in the Chandigarh Organization.

End-all strategy:-

The Ground breaking strategy by Le Corbusier was extensively like the one arranged by Albert Mayer and Mathew Nowicki, then again, actually the state of the city plan was changed from one with a bending street organization to a rectangular shape with a field design for the quick traffic streets, other than diminishing its region for the explanation of economy. The city plan was considered as a post-war ‘Nursery City’ wherein vertical and elevated structures were precluded, keeping in view the financial circumstances and residing propensities for individuals.

Every one of the fundamental streets were fixed, the aspects and association of the superblocks were reformatted, a total order of course was laid out, the terminology was changed, and the Capital “head” was solidly situated set up.

The illustration of a person was being utilized in the arrangement – the ‘head’ contained the capital mind boggling, the ‘heart’ the business place, and the ‘arms’, which were opposite to the principal pivot, had the scholar and recreation offices. The arrangement integrated Le Corbusier’s standards of light, space and plant life. What had been named an “Metropolitan Town” in Mayer’s arrangement, Le Corbusier renamed a “Sectors”.

Sectors Chandigarh secretariat:-

Le Corbusier isolated the city into various Areas. Every Area or the neighbored unit, is very like the customary Indian ‘Mohalla’, and measures 800 meters by 1200 meters, covering 250 sections of land of region. The area highlighted a green strip running north to south, separated by a business street running east to west. The roads were coordinated in a lessening pecking order and marked V1 through V8: V1: blood vessel streets that interface one city to another, V2: metropolitan, city streets, V3: vehicular street encompassing an area, V 4: shopping road of an area, V5: circulation street wandering through an area, V6 private street, V7: passerby way, V8: cycle track. Every Area is encircled by V2 or V3 streets, without any structures opening onto them and intended to be independent, with shopping and local area offices inside sensible strolling distance.

The instructive, social and clinical offices are spread all around the city, notwithstanding, significant organizations are situated in Areas 10, 11, 12, 14 and 26. The two Universities, the Ecole d’Art et d’Architecture from 1950-1965 are significant structures by Le Corbusier. Their studios and homerooms are gathered around inside yards. The structures are seriously arranged north and south so that light enters from the north. The lobbies are isolated by low parcels. Le Corbusier established that these school edifices and the Exhibition hall must be worked of the ruddy earthy colored block that is normal in India, or if nothing else confronted with this block; along these lines, he tried to forestall structures inside sight of the State house from drawing in an excess of consideration from his distinction structures of cement.

The modern region contains 2.35 sq km, put away in the Ground breaking strategy for non-contaminating, light industry on the super southeastern side of the city close to the rail route line, as distant from the Instructive Areas and Legislative hall Complicated as could really be expected.

Sector 17/City Centre and Chandigarh secretariat :-

The downtown area (Area 17) is the core of Chandigarh’s exercises. It includes the Between State Transport End, March Ground, Area Courts, and so forth on one hand, and a huge business and shopping centre on the other. The 4-story substantial structures house banks and workplaces above and display areas/shops at the ground level with wide common concourses. The Neelam piazza in the middle has wellsprings with light and water highlights. Area 34 is another recently evolved business area.

The streets were planned and situated so that more often than not during the day, they are under shadow. There are immense stopping regions for the business zones so the Stopping issues don’t make devastation on the primary streets.

Le Corbusier called it Les Sept Voies de Course, or 7Vs. The reasoning of his arranging was the engine vehicle. “From his initial examinations in urbanism, Le Corbusier had distinguished the engine vehicle as the focal variable of current town arranging. His underlying, fundamentally stylish, semi Futurist reaction to the engine vehicle and to fast development in the urban communities had, by 1950, transformed into a hypothetical answer for the issues of present day traffic – – a reviewed arrangement of dissemination, from crossing mainlands to strolling to the front entryway. The 7 Versus act in the town plan as the circulation system, the lymph framework and the respiratory framework act in science. These frameworks are very levelheaded, they are unique in relation to one another, and there is no disarray between them, yet they are as one … It is for us to gain from them when we are sorting out the ground that lies underneath our feet. The 7Vs are at this point not the vile instruments of death, however become a coordinated pecking order of streets which can manage present day traffic flow’.” [Prasad Sunand, 1987].

Le Corbusier had confidence as one by utilizing the Plan standard of Balance. He planned bunches of lodges. With every unit comprising of a basic game plan of a veranda, two rooms, a kitchen, an outside water wardrobe, and an “Indian-style” latrine, every unit had outdoors space in front and back as expansions of the house and was conquered by an optional parasol rooftop to keep it cool. ” It is a similar standard which was utilized in the huge loft obstructs (the Join at Marseilles for instance)”, Le Corbusier noted, “where on the 17 stories the condos are touching and of a similar design”.

Chandigarh was Le Corbusier’s chance to satisfy his thoughts, and he obviously projected onto India. Le Corbusier, nonetheless, couldn’t execute his full picture of a city. Other than the End-all strategy, the genuine lodging of the city was not what he maintained that it should be. Le Corbusier’s vision is contained in the chronicled record of a first gathering in 1950. Le Corbusier authoritatively reported to the remainder of the group: “My piece of the work will then, at that point, fabricate a “Block of Building”, a “Home Solidarity” which as of now exists, that can be probed the spot and will be one of the many “Staying Solidarities” which you will work around there. I might want to develop a couple of public structures to utilize my own insight”.

“Abiding Solidarity” is the English interpreter’s strict interpretation of “Join d’ Habitation”. Le Corbusier needed to see more Join in Chandigarh. His renowned units were models of incorporated vertical living. Taken clear off the ground plane, they were intended to accentuate their relationship with the sun and the sky and their independence from the beginning. Le Corbusier couldn’t understand this kind of Join together, enormous loft blocks in Chandigarh.

Chandigarh secretariat :-

The Secretariat (1953) is an extremely enormous structure and 254 meters in length and 42 meters high houses the ecclesiastical chambers and every clerical office. The Services are gathered in a focal structure, Block 4, one of the six clerical blocks, each isolated from the following by an upward development joint expanding the full level of the structure.

The outside is of unpleasant concrete, in other words, the vertical brise-soleil, the railings and the flat brise-soleil, the acroterium which contrasts the sky leaving noticeable the housetop facilities which are to be utilized for a club and for gatherings. The two enormous slopes before and behind the structure, serve all floors and are moreover in unpleasant cement. They offer an exceptionally overwhelming arrangement of flow (morning and night) for the 3.000 workers.

Vertical course is guaranteed by batteries of ele­vators matched by a flight of stairs running in the two headings encased in an upward spine ascending from ground level to the culmination of the rooftop. Harsh cement comparatively covers the two end walls drawing out the impact of the standard sheet-metal formwork.

The block of ecclesiastical workplaces has been the object of extremely cautious examination as to the sculptural help given to harsh cement by the impact of different kinds of brise-soleil. The unpleasant cement again mediates in the fenestration of the two primary veneers: more than 10.000 units of an exceptional plan – one bolster type 27×7 cm in segment and 366 cm high comprise the “undulatory coating”. This concerns an appli­cation here of the Modular which allows the extending of a cloak of glass broadening the whole length and level of the structure, hindered by components called “ventilators” which contain a shade of sheet-metal turning upward from floor to roof across an opening of 43 cm and equipped for being opened to any ideal width, from 1 millimeter up to 43 centimeters; covered, what’s more, by a drape of copper mosquito-netting. Along these lines, a colossal setting aside of cash and upkeep was acknowledged with this fenestration, when contrasted and wood or metal.

The Modular has; directed the essential segment of the workplace types in the structure (3.66 meters of level under the transoms) allowing a harmonization of the levels of the clerical chambers by a multiplying of extents and has given to blocks 5 and 6, which lay on pilotis at park level, a play of level of genuine persuasiveness (entrance level to the Pastors’ structure, level of ecclesiastical workplaces and the pilotis of blocks 5 and 6).

The 3.000 representatives of the Secretariat show up by transport, bike, or by walking, and (have various gets to relying on whether the course they take from the city is the “Avenue of the Waters” or the “Valley of Relaxation”. The auto network is settled in all through the recreation area of the Legislative center, in this way barring vehicles from the visual field of the easygoing carriage in the recreation area.

Legislative Assembly:-

The Parliament or Official Get together (1955) was planned as an enormous box with the entry colonnade on one side, substantial wharfs on the other, and a tedious example on the veneer. Sculptural structures on the rooftop, a sensational ‘channel’ top light over the Gathering, and a shifted pyramid over the Senate chambers finished the organization.

The Gathering Corridor has a square arrangement. The Gathering chamber, as an exaggerated shell, is encircled by stately space. This flow space is arranged as a faintly lit, triple-level, segmented lobby for casual gatherings and conversations. The side of the lobby confronting the high court has an incredible patio and eight flimsy docks. These wharfs outline a perspective on looks at the Shavlik Slopes.

A stylized turning entryway is set in a toppy turvy sound of the porch. Le Corbusier was roused by the type of the cooling pinnacles of a power station close to Ahmedabad. The modeler planned the exaggerated shell of the Gathering chamber with a base breadth of 39.6m. This shell is 38m and ends in a diagonal segment with a metallic structure at the top. This system coordinates the interaction of normal and counterfeit lighting, ventilation, and acoustics.

The exaggerated shell is just 15cm thick, which helped in lessening the expense and the heaviness of the construction. The Get together chamber has a seating limit of 252 people. Extra exhibitions are accommodated women, columnists, and authorities. Acoustical treatment has been given to the Gathering Chamber to adjust and control the sound levels by giving sound-engrossing boards in brilliant varieties and irregular curvilinear shapes. The Committee chamber, with a limit of 70 seats is delegated by a pyramid, which concedes light from the north into its inside. A woman’s exhibition with 90 seats, a men’s display with 104 seats, and a press exhibition with 24 seats are likewise given in this chamber. Flights of stairs, lifts and slopes give different method for dissemination and admittance to various levels of the structure. The development of the whole design is in uncovered built up concrete.

The High Court :-

The High Court (1952) has been being used since Walk 1956. The methodologies have not at this point been ready: two of the three bowls of water have not yet been uncovered before the Royal residence; the outside polychromic is charged up, for the occasion, on the central exterior, simply by the brise- soleil of the Courtrooms; the three arches of the excellent entry porch, covered with a concrete delivering, are to be painted-one green, the other white, and the third in red-orange, both left and right walls to be painted dark.

 

Our other social links

Instagram 

other blogs and works

construction-materials

Vaastu-shastra

Architecture of Taj Mahal

Architecture of Taj Mahal, History and layout of Taj Mahal

Architecture of Taj Mahal

Architecture of Taj Mahal,  in like manner spelt Taj Mahal, burial chamber complex in Agra, western Uttar Pradesh state, northern India. The Taj Mahal was worked by the Mughal sovereign Shah Jahān (managed 1628-58) to revere his life partner Mumtaz Mahal (“Picked One of the Imperial home”), who kicked the can in labor in 1631, having been the ruler’s resolute mate since their marriage in 1612. India’s most notable and by and large saw building is organized in the eastern region of the city on the southern (right) bank of the Yamuna (Jamuna) Stream. Agra Fortification (Red Post), moreover on the right bank of the Yamuna, is around 1 mile (1.6 km) west of the Taj Mahal.

In its neighborly degrees and its fluid joining of enhancing parts, the Taj Mahal is perceived as the best representation of Mughal designing, a blend of Indian, Persian, and Islamic styles. Various attractions integrate twin mosque structures (put uniformly on either side of the tomb), wonderful nurseries, and a display. Quite possibly of the most beautiful fundamental piece on earth, the Taj Mahal is moreover one of the world’s most infamous tourist spots, visited by a large number of voyagers consistently. The complex was allocated an UNESCO World Heritage site in 1983.

Architecture of Taj Mahal

History of construction:- 

The plans for the complex have been credited to various organizers of the period, but the focal modeler was possible Ustad Aḥmad Lahawrī, an Indian of Persian fall. The five head parts of the complex — major doorway, garden, mosque, jawāb (from a genuine perspective “answer”; a construction mirroring the mosque), and sepulcher (counting its four minarets) — were thought of and arranged as a bound together substance according to the standards of Mughal building practice, which allowed no subsequent extension or change. Building started around 1632. More than 20,000 experts were used from India, Persia, the Ottoman Domain, and Europe to complete the genuine sepulcher by around 1638-39; the associate designs were finished by 1643, and adornment work happened until something like 1647. Out and out, improvement of the 42-segment of land (17-hectare) complex crossed 22 years.

A custom relates that Shah Jahān at first intended to create another mausoleum across the stream to house his own leftover parts. That plan was to have been created of dull marble, and it was to have been related by a platform to the Taj Mahal. He was excused in 1658 by his youngster Aurangzeb, regardless, and was kept for the rest of his life in Agra Post.

Plan and designing Architecture of Taj Mahal :-

Resting in a wide plinth 23 feet (7 meters) high, the mausoleum genuine is of white marble that reflects conceals according to the power of sunlight or night sparkle. It has four practically indistinct outsides, each with a wide central bend climbing to 108 feet (33 meters) at its zenith and chamfered (slanted) corners incorporating more unassuming bends. The grand central vault, which shows up at a degree of 240 feet (73 meters) at the tip of its finial, is surrounded by four lesser curves. The acoustics inside the principal vault cause the single note of a woodwind to reverberate on numerous occasions. Within the burial place is facilitated around an octagonal marble chamber ornamented with low-easing carvings and semiprecious stones (pietra dura). In that are the cenotaphs of Mumtaz Mahal and Shah Jahān. Those fake internment places are encased by a finely designed filigree marble screen. Under the internment places, at garden level, lie the authentic stone caskets. Standing flawlessly isolated from the central design, at all of the four corners of the square plinth, are lovely minarets.

Flanking the sepulcher near the northwestern and northeastern edges of the nursery, exclusively, are two equally undefined designs — the mosque, which highlights the east, and its jawab, which highlights the west and gives classy harmony. Worked of red Sikri sandstone with marble-necked vaults and architraves, they contrast in both assortment and surface with the mausoleum’s white marble.

The nursery is set out along dated Mughal lines — a square quartered by extended streams (pools) — with walking ways, wellsprings, and ornamental trees. Encased by the walls and plans of the staggering, it gives a working out way to agreement with the mausoleum, which ought to be noticeable reflected in the nursery’s central pools.

The southern completion of the complex is graced by a wide red sandstone entry with a recessed central bend two stories high. White marble outlining around the bend is enlivened with dim Qurʾānic lettering and bloom plans. The essential bend is flanked by two arrangements of additional unassuming bends. Assigned the northern and southern outsides of the section are matching lines of white chattris (chhatris; vault like plans), 11 to each facade, joined by thin elaborate minarets that climb to almost 98 feet (30 meters). At the four corners of the development are octagonal apexes covered with greater segments.

Two extraordinary decorating features are reiterated all through the complex: pietra dura and Arabic calligraphy. As exemplified in the Mughal make, pietra dura (Italian: “hard stone”) merges the embellish of semiprecious stones of various tones, including lapis lazuli, jade, diamond, turquoise, and amethyst, in significantly formalized and lacing numerical and blossom plans. The assortments actually moderate the astounding field of the white Makrana marble. Under the orientation of Amānat Khan al-Shīrāzī, ceases from the Qurʾān were kept across different region of the Taj Mahal in calligraphy, crucial to Islamic imaginative custom. One of the etchings in the sandstone entryway is known as Dawn (89:28-30) and invites the committed to enter paradise. Calligraphy in like manner envelops the taking off calculated sections to the sepulcher real. To ensure a uniform appearance from the vantage point of the patio, the lettering developments in size according to its general level and distance from the watcher.

Current issues:-

All through the drawn out the Taj Mahal has been probably going to negligence and decay. A critical recovery was finished close to the beginning of the 20th 100 years under the heading of Ruler Curzon, then, the English messenger of India. Even more lately, air tainting achieved by releases from foundries and other close by assembling plants and fumes from motor vehicles has hurt the burial place, prominently its marble outside. Different measures have been taken to decrease the risk to the milestone, among them the finish of specific foundries and the foundation of tainting control equipment at others, the development of a parkland support zone around the complex, and the confining of adjoining vehicular traffic. A recovery and assessment program for the Taj Mahal was begun in 1998. Progress in dealing with regular conditions around the milestone has been slow, in any case.

Incidentally the Taj Mahal has been probably going to India’s political components. Late night seeing was confined there some place in the scope of 1984 and 2004 considering the way that it was normal that the milestone would be a target of Sikh aggressors. Moreover, it continuously has come to be seen as an Indian social picture. A couple of Hindu nationalist packs have tried to diminish the meaning of the Muslim effect in addressing the starting points and plan of the Taj Mahal.

the catacomb, a tremendous, sepulchral milestone, consistently made of stone, that is used to cover and venerate the leftover pieces of a notable or resilient person. The term catacomb can similarly mean various types of over-the-ground structures used for human internments.

The word is gotten from Mausolus, head of Caria (an old district of Anatolia), in whose memory his widow, Artemisia II, raised an extraordinary entombment place at Halicarnassus (c. 353-c. 350 BCE; current Bodrum, Turkey). The Mausoleum is one of the Seven Supernatural occurrences of the World. A few excess pieces of the milestone are at present in the English Verifiable focus in London.

Apparently the most forceful and renowned burial place is the broadly acclaimed white marble Taj Mahal at Agra, India, worked by the Mughal head Shah Jahān for his main companion, Mumtāz Maḥal, who passed on in 1631. He at first expected to develop another sepulcher in dim marble for himself, backwards the Taj Mahal, yet he was excused and a while later passed on before work could begin. Other striking models consolidate the sepulcher of the Roman head Hadrian, as of now the Castel Sant’Angelo in Rome; that of the Prussian master Frederick William III and Sovereign Louisa of Mecklenburg-Strelitz at Charlottenburg, Germany, near Berlin; of the French ruler Napoleon III at Farnborough, Hampshire, England; of the Turkish boss Kemal Atatürk at Ankara, Turkey; and of the Soviet boss Vladimir Ilich Lenin at Moscow.

Shah Jahān period architecture of Taj Mahal :-

Shah Jahān period designing, an Indian construction style that flourished under the help of the Mughal sovereign Shah Jahān (controlled 1628-58), its most noteworthy achievement being the brilliant tomb at Agra, the Taj Mahal. Among various places of interest of the style are a couple of mosques at the ruler’s generally significant capital, Agra, and another inconceivable mosque and a colossal fortress illustrious home complex at his resulting capital, Delhi. The use of the twofold vault, the recessed entry inside a rectangular fronton, and parklike ecological elements were all most cherished devices of Shah Jahān period producers. Equality and concordance between the bits of a construction were continually stressed, as was touchy careful craftsmanship. White marble was a leaned toward building material. See moreover Mughal plan.

World Heritage site Architecture of Taj Mahal :-

World Inheritance site, any of various locales or articles engraved on the Brought together Nations Educational, Intelligent and Social Affiliation (UNESCO) World Heritage Overview. The objections are allocated as having “outstanding general worth” under the Show Concerning the Security of the World Social and Customary Heritage. This record was taken on by UNESCO in 1972 and authoritatively created results in 1975 ensuing to having been affirmed by 20 countries. It gives a design to worldwide cooperation in saving and defending social fortunes and ordinary locales generally through the world.

Designating World Heritage sites:-

There are three kinds of districts: social, ordinary, and mixed. Social inheritance objections integrate numerous important designs and town areas, huge archeological objections, and works of terrific figure or painting. Standard heritage objections are restricted to those typical districts that (1) outfit astounding occurrences of Earth’s record of life or its geologic cycles, (2) give phenomenal cases of advancing ecological and normal groundbreaking cycles, (3) contain customary quirks that are captivating, novel, champion, or of unprecedented greatness, or (4) outfit domains for intriguing or endangered animals or plants or are regions of exceptional biodiversity. Mixed heritage objections contain parts of both standard and social significance. The extent of social to standard objections on the World Inheritance Overview is around 3 to 1. A couple of new objections are added to the summary in each year (until 2002, regions were incorporated December).

Starting points of the World Inheritance Show:-

The fundamental impetus for the gathering of the World Inheritance Show was the improvement of the Aswan High Dam. In 1959 the conditions of the Bound together Bedouin Republic (U.A.R.; as of now Egypt and Syria) and Sudan went to UNESCO for help in protecting the old-fashioned districts and milestones of Egyptian Nubia. The objections were subverted with destruction by the exceptional Lake which would foster behind the new dam at Aswān. UNESCO replied with a charm for the overall neighborhood help, and the result was the greatest archeological rescue action of all time.

Taj Mahal is a clergyman of Shah Jahan’s strong interest in building and imaginative headways. The new compositional style integrates points that were to infringe a great deal of resulting Indian designing. Balance along various sides of a central turn, new columnar styles, curvilinear designs, and delegate plans considering naturalistic plant topics are characteristics of the Shahjahan style that can be found in the Taj Mahal Complex.

Presentation Architecture of Taj Mahal :-

The tomb is absolutely clad in white marble. Intimating the stone’s gleam, the Mughal scholars stood out it from early sunrise or to a cloud. Kalim created:

It is a [piece of] heaven of the shade of dawn’s magnificent face, considering the way that beginning to end and back to front it is of marble – Nay, not marble because of its reasonable tone (av-u-rang) The eye can mistake it for a cloud.

Kanbo suggests “the illuminated entombment chamber (rauza-I-munauwara) on whose each stone piece from early morning until late night the whiteness of the certified dawn is reflected, causing the watcher to neglect to recall his yearning to move towards the most raised heaven”.

Concepts:-

Subject to Shah Jahan, the meaningful substance of Mughal configuration showed up at its apex. Propelled by a part by Bibadal Khan, the regal goldsmith and essayist, and simply equivalent to most Mughal commemoration administration designing, the Taj Mahal complex was considered as an impersonation on earth of the spot of Mumtaz in paradise.

This subject infiltrates the entire many-sided and teaches the arrangement and appearance with respect to all of its parts. Different discretionary principles were furthermore used, of which request is the most predominant. A cognizant exchange was spread out between the construction’s parts, its surface enhancement, materials, numerical readiness and its acoustics. This exchange connects from what ought to be noticeable with the resources, into severe, academic, mathematical and awesome considerations.

Symbolism Architecture of Taj Mahal :-

In the Taj Mahal, the different evened out use of red sandstone and white marble adds to complex symbolic significance. The Mughals were explaining a thought which followed its fundamental establishments to earlier Hindu practices, set out in the Vishnudharmottara Purana, which recommended white stone for structures for the Brahmins (sanctified position) and red stone for people from the Kshatriyas (legend standing). By building structures that used such assortment coding, the Mughals separated themselves with the two driving classes of Indian social plan and in like manner described themselves as rulers in Indian terms. Red sandstone similarly had significance in the Persian beginning stages of the Mughal Domain, where red was the prohibitive shade of preeminent tents.

Its symbolism is complicated, according to one point of view drawing out a more extraordinary, stylised and very sturdy nursery of paradise than could be found filling in the normal nursery; on the other, an instrument of exposure for Jahan’s essayists who portrayed him as an ‘erect cypress of the nursery of the caliphate’ and consistently used plant portrayals to laud his incredible organization, individual, family and court. Plant delineations similarly find a common trademark with Hindu practices where such pictures as the ‘container of abundance’ (purna-ghata) can be found and were obtained by the Mughal modelers.

Sound was moreover used to convey contemplations of paradise. All within the burial place gains some resounding experiences (the time taken from when a clatter is made until its resonations have lessened) of 28 seconds giving a climate where the declarations of the Hafiz, as they requested of God for the soul of Mumtaz, would stand by in the air.

Translation Architecture of Taj Mahal :-

The structure was additionally used to attest Jahani misleading publicity concerning the ‘flawlessness’ of the Mughal authority. Wayne Begley set forward a translation in 1979 that takes advantage of the Islamic thought that the ‘Nursery of Heaven’ is likewise the area of the ‘high position of god’ upon the arrival of judgment. In his perusing, the Taj Mahal is viewed as a landmark where Shah Jahan has appropriated the power of the ‘privileged position of god’ imagery for the glorification of his own rule. Koch deviates, finding this an excessively intricate clarification and bringing up that the ‘High position’ sura from the Qu’ran (sura2 section 255) is absent from the calligraphic engravings.

This time of Mughal engineering best represents the development of a style that had integrated Islamic design with its native partners. When the Mughals fabricated the Taj, however pleased with their Persian and Timurid roots, they had come to consider themselves to be Indian. Copplestone states “Despite the fact that it is unquestionably a local Indian creation, its engineering achievement lays on its essentially Persian feeling of clear and undisturbed extents, applied to clean, and simple surfaces.”

Components:-

The consistency of shapes has been set in a specific progressive highlight. One sort of section, called the Shahjahani segment is utilized in the whole mind boggling. It has a diverse shaft, a capital developed from small curves, inward components and a base with four multi-cusped angled boards. Extents and subtleties of the sections differ as per their situation in the complex; least difficult in the market roads, bigger and more extravagant in the funerary region.

The head working of the whole mind boggling is the catacomb and the most naturalistic beautification shows up here. The flanking structures; the mosque and human khana [Guest House implied exclusively for collecting for prayers] share reflect evenness and show less naturalistic and less refined adornment; in the nursery structures, it is utilized just sparingly; and none shows up in the Jilaukhana or the marketplace and caravanserai complex. The components of the auxiliary units are organized with a similar mirror balance. Incorporated into the general carina evenness are halfway arranged components; the four-section garden, the four-section market and caravanserai complex, and the scaled down Char bagh of the internal auxiliary burial chambers. The catacomb and the extraordinary door have concentrated plans. Every component has an imperative impact in the entire, assuming even one of the parts was feeling the loss of; the equilibrium of the whole structure would be obliterated.

The Principles:-

PRINCIPLES OF SHAHJAHANI ARCHITECTURE AND AS THEY ARE EXPRESSED IN THE TAJ MAHAL:

The complex of the Taj Mahal investigates the capability of the riverfront garden as both an optimal funerary and a utilitarian common build; it likewise communicates in sanctioned structure the design standards of the period.

1. Objective and severe math.
2. Ideal even preparation with an accentuation on respective balance (carina) along a focal hub of the fundamental elements. In an ordinary Shahjahani carina conspire, two even highlights flank a prevailing focal component.
3. A various leveled evaluating of materials, structures and varieties.
4. Triadic divisions are bound together in relative recipes. These decide the state of plans, heights and structural Trimming.
5. Consistency of shapes, requested by progressive accents.
6. Exotic tender loving care.
7. Specific utilization of naturalism.
8. Imagery.
9. These standards administer the whole engineering of Shah Jahan. They are communicated most amazingly and most reliably in the Taj Mahal.

The Symmetry

The engineering was to communicate this idea through amazing evenness, amicable corresponding connections, and the clear white marble confronting which gives the immaculateness of the mathematical and levelheaded arranging the ideal unworldly appearance. The sepulcher is raised over an enhanced rendition of the nine-crease plan inclined toward by the Mughals for burial places and nursery structures.

A variation is utilized in the extraordinary door. In the catacomb, the arrangement is communicated in wonderful cross-pivotal evenness, with the goal that the structure is centered around the focal burial place chamber. What’s more, the inward association is considered the exteriors, which present an impeccably adjusted piece when seen from the expansions of the tomahawks which create the arrangement.

Respective evenness overwhelmed by a focal emphasize has for the most part been perceived as a requesting standard of the engineering of rulers focusing on outright power, as a declaration of the decision force which achieves equilibrium and concordance, a striking image of the definition of highborn society under brought together power. Uneven reviewing down to the minutest decorative detail, especially striking is the bite the dust various leveled utilization of variety. The main structure in the entire complex altogether dashed with white marble is the sepulcher. This hierarchic utilization of white marble and red sandstone is commonplace of supreme Mughal design

The Organization:-

In this manner the whole Taj complex comprised of two parts, each following the riverfront garden plan; the char bagh and porch; a genuine riverfront garden and a landlocked variation in the design of the two auxiliary units, where the square shape Jilaukhana compared to the riverfront patio, and the cross-hub market and caravanserai component to the char bagh. That lost complex was an indispensable piece of the Taj Mahal, framing its counter-picture, as per the fundamental Shahjahani compositional guideline of balanced correspondence.

The Plan:-

The students of history and writers of Shah Jahan express that the Taj Mahal was to address a natural reproduction of the place of Mumtaz Mahal in the Nurseries of Heaven. This should not be excused as Shahjahani court manner of speaking: it genuinely communicates the program of the sepulcher. To understand the possibility of the hematological nursery house as intently as could be expected, the sanctioned out of past royal catacombs, where the structure remained at the focal point of a cross-pivotally arranged garden or chahar bagh, is deserted, and the riverfront plan that had turned into the predominant private nursery kind of Agra was picked all things being equal, and raised to a fantastic scope.

The cooperation among private and funerary types portrayed Mughal engineering all along. In the Taj Mahal, the point was to consummate the riverfront garden and develop it to a scale past the compass of customary humans, to make here on the planet and in the Mughal city paradisiacal nursery royal residence for the departed.

Ground Format of The Taj Mahal Complex:-

The principal north-south hub goes through the nursery channel and the marketplace road. On it are set the prevailing aspects: the tomb, the pool, the extraordinary door, the Jilaukhana, the southern entryway of the Jilaukhana, and the chalk (square) of the market and caravanserai complex.

 

Our other social links

Instagram 

other blogs and works

construction-materials

Vaastu-shastra

History of architecture

History of Architecture (ad 500 to ad 1940)

History of architecture is the investigation of the development of engineering through the ages and across many geologies and social settings. From the Mesopotamian progress to the Egyptians and Greeks, engineering history is a transnational one. In the accompanying article you will become familiar with various design periods and styles since forever ago.

History of Architecture:- 

Generally talking, design has an extended and muddled history that matches the intricacy of mankind’s set of experiences itself. The Neolithic time frame, approximately quite a while back, could be viewed as the start of engineering, or it could simply be the moment when individuals quit residing in caves and started planning their homes. It is not difficult to consider design regarding its visual appeal, yet this longing to build a structural relic was fueled by something other than the requirement for excellence. One of the most charming highlights of design is its capacity to reflect the soul of time in a manner that might be considerably more critical than how we witness it with workmanship. Engineering has demonstrated to be numerous things: agreeable, rich, present day, ruthless, indexical, vernacular. To legitimize the parallelism between engineering history and mankind’s set of experiences, there could be no finer actual proof of society change than design. It is feasible to find out about the historical backdrop of engineering by basically taking a gander at the designs that were inherent various areas at various times. Human activities were reflected in design, and this was put forth more clear by the steady attempt to save a portion of the built history, while choosing to allow the rest to blur and destroy.

Neo-Gothic (1905 AD TO 1930 AD ):-

In the mid twentieth 100 years, archaic Gothic thoughts were applied to present day structures, both confidential homes and the new kind of engineering called high rises.
Gothic Recovery was a Victorian style roused by Gothic churches and other middle age design. Gothic Recovery home plan started in the Unified Realm during the 1700s when Sir Horace Walpole chose to redesign his home, Strawberry Slope. In the mid twentieth 100 years, Gothic Recovery thoughts were applied to present day high rises, which are much of the time called Neo-Gothic.
Neo-Gothic high rises frequently areas of strength for have lines and a feeling of extraordinary level; curved and pointed windows with beautifying mesh; figures of grotesqueness and other middle age carvings; and zeniths.

History of architecture

History of architecture

Art Nouveau (1890 AD TO 1940 AD):-

Known as the Recent fad in France, Craftsmanship Nouveau was first communicated in quite a while and visual computerization.
The style spread to engineering and furniture during the 1890s as a rebel against industrialization directed individuals’ concentration toward the regular structures and individual craftsmanship of Human expression and Specialties Development.
Craftsmanship Nouveau structures frequently have topsy-turvy shapes, curves, and enriching Japanese-like surfaces with bended, plant-like plans and mosaics.
The period is frequently mistaken for Workmanship Deco, which has a completely unique visual look and philosophical beginning.

History of architecture

History of architecture

American Colonial (1600 AD TO 1780 AD):-

Pioneer engineering qualities include: Even front and rectangular shape.
Two stories. A shelter expansion with a saltbox rooftop (essentially where the rooftop toward the rear of the house broadens practically right to the cold earth the state of saltboxes in the time.

History of architecture

Rococo Architecture (1650 AD TO 1790 AD):- 

During the last period of the Florid time frame, manufacturers developed elegant white structures with clearing bends
Ornate craftsmanship and engineering is described by rich embellishing plans with scrolls, plants, shell-shapes, and fragile mathematical examples.
Ornate impeccably mirrored the wanton sluggishness and decline of the French Regal Court and High Society.
Dissimilar to other major compositional developments, similar to Romanesque, Gothic or Elaborate, Lavish was truly worried about inside plan.
This was on the grounds that it arose and remained trotted in France, where rich benefactors were reluctant to revamp houses and chateaux, liking rather to rebuild their insides. Also, the style was very unusual and carefree for the outsides of strict and city structures.
Maybe along these lines, in spite of the fact that it spread from France to Germany, where it demonstrated more famous with Catholics than Protestants, it was less generally welcomed in other European nations like Britain, The Low Nations, Spain and even Itally . It was cleared away by the French Upset and by the sterner Neoclassicism which proclaimed a re-visitation of Traditional qualities and styles, more with regards to the Period of Edification and Reason.

History of architecture

Baroque Architecture (1600 AD TO 1830 AD):-

The Elaborate style is reflected in rich and emotional chapels with sporadic shapes and extreme ornamentation.
In France, the profoundly ornamented Florid style joins with Traditional restriction .Russian blue-bloods were dazzled by Versailles in France, and consolidated Elaborate thoughts in the structure of St. Petersburg.
Components of the intricate Extravagant style are found all through Europe . Russian blue-bloods were dazzled by the Royal residence of Versailles, France and consolidated Elaborate thoughts in the structure of St. Petersburg. Components of the intricate Elaborate style are found all through Europe.

History of architecture

History of architecture

Renaissance Architecture (1400 AD TO 1600 AD):-

Funded by business thriving and contest between city-states, like Florence, Rome and Venice, as well as rich families like the Medici banking tradition in Florence and the Fuggers banking family in Germany, the Renaissance was neverthess a victory of will over world occasions. Not some time before, there had been a run of shocking European harvests (1315-19); the Dark Passing disease (1346) which cleared out 33% of the European populace; the 100 Years Battle among Britain and France (1339-1439), and the Christian Church was enraptured by split. Scarcely ideal circumstances for the resurrection or rinacimento that followed. As it was, the sixteenth century Popes in Rome nearly bankrupted the Congregation in the mid sixteenth 100 years because of their degenerate supporting of fine structures and the visual expressions.

History of architecture

History of architecture

Gothic Architecture (1100 AD TO 1450 AD):-

Gothic design started for the most part in France, where planners were enlivened by Romanesque engineering and the sharp curves of Spanish Moorish design.
It advanced from Romanesque engineering and was prevailed by Renaissance design. It’s not difficult to perceive Gothic structures due to their curves, ribbed vaulting, flying braces, elaborate models (like figures of deformity) and stained glass windows. Gothic design was initially known as “French Style”. As a structural style, Gothic grew principally in religious design, and its standards and trademark structures were applied to different sorts of structures. In the twelfth and thirteenth hundreds of years, progresses in designing empowered modelers to plan and finish progressively immense structures.

History of architecture

History of architecture

Byzantine Architecture (AD- 527 and 565):-

When Constantine turned into the Caesar of the Roman domain, the Realm had parted fifty
The Western Roman Domain focused in Rome, speaking Latin
The Eastern Roman Domain of Byzantium (Constantinople), today Istanbul
Byzantium, “New Rome”, was subsequently renamed Constantinople and is currently called Istanbul.
The domain persevered for over a thousand years, decisively impacting Middle age and Renaissance period engineering in Europe and, following the catch of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks in 1453, driving straightforwardly to the design of the Ottoman Realm. The Eastern Domain, or Byzantine Realm became solid and stable in the 6th hundred years under Ruler Justinian: enduring 1000 years, with an extraordinary social history It tumbled to the Turks in 1453. The boundaries were penetrated and the Head had to forsake Rome, moving the middle toward the north, first to Milan then to Ravenna.
Savages poured out over the remainder of the Roman Realm, Germany, Spain, Italy, Gaul, and Africa. Toward the 6th c’s end. there were many savage realms which supplanted the focal power of the Roman Ruler. Ocean exchange stopped, incredible urban areas were deserted, and Rome contracted. practically every organization of the Public authority stopped, with the exception of one. the Congregation.

Architectural Characteristics:-

Portrayed particularly by enormous vaults with square bases and Engineering adjusted curves and towers and broad utilization of glass mosaics.
Early Byzantine design was worked as a continuation of Roman engineering.
Elaborate float, mechanical progression, and political and regional changes implied that an unmistakable style continuously arose which pervaded specific impacts from the Close to East and involved the Greek cross arrangement in chapel engineering.
Greek cross arrangement in chapel design – A cross with four equivalent arms at right points
Structures expanded in mathematical intricacy, block and mortar were utilized notwithstanding stone in the enhancement of significant public designs, traditional orders were utilized all the more openly, mosaics supplanted GREEK CROSS LATIN CROSS cut enrichment, complex vaults settled upon gigantic wharfs, and windows sifted light through slender sheets of alabaster to enlighten insides delicately.

History of architecture

History of architecture

Romanesque Architecture (500 AD TO 1200 AD):-

Romanesque is motivated by What is Romanesque Roman design.
Similitudes among Roman and Romanesque incorporate round curves, stone materials, and the basilica-style plan (utilized for mainstream purposes by the Romans).
Impacts that prompted the Romanesque style are undeniably more mind boggling – Romanesque design additionally shows impacts from gothic, Carolingian, Byzantine and Islamic engineering.
The Romanesque time frame can’t be exactly characterized – yet Romanesque engineering by and large dates from 1000 to 1150
Romanesque was at its level between around 1075 and 1125.

Architectural Characteristics:-

Joining elements of contemporary Western Roman and Byzantine structures, Romanesque engineering is known by its enormous quality, its thick walls, round curves, durable wharfs, crotch vaults, huge pinnacles and enriching arcading. Each building has plainly characterized structures and they are habitually of extremely customary, balanced plan so the general appearance is one of effortlessness when contrasted and the Gothic structures that were to follow. The style can be distinguished right across Europe, in spite of provincial attributes and various materials.

History of architecture

History of architecture

Early Christian Architecture (373 AD TO 500 AD):-

The Early Christian engineering began in two conspicuous areas focused at Rome and Constantinople.
The Place of Rome as the focal point of an overall realm was a significant element. Christianity to become general.
The quarry of the remnants of roman structures affected the engineering treatment of the style, both as to development and beautification
Early Christian design at Rome was affected by, and was the consistent result of, existing Roman engineering.
Segments and other structural highlights and marbles from the more established structures were worked into the plan of new Basilicas chapels of the Christians.

Architectural Characteristics:-

With Christianity generally acknowledged as a state religion in Rome it was vital for design to answer the requests of the religion for love space.
Method of love was the main determinant of the type of the congregation
The term early Christian engineering alludes to the design of the early Christian holy places of the roman period
With Christianity acknowledged as a state religion in Rome and extending in impact, it became important for design to answer the space requests of the new religion

The prerequisites include:
1. A way for processional passage and exit of the ministry
2. A special raised area region, where the church celebrate mass
3. A space for the isolation of the ministry from the gathering during parade and fellowship Internment space.

History of architecture

History of architecture

Classical Architecture (850 AD TO 476 AD ):-

Traditional engineering alludes to the style and plan of structures in antiquated Greece and old Rome. Traditional engineering molded our way to deal with working in Western provinces all over the planet.
The period between the ascent of the Greek Domain and the fall of the Roman Realm has in the long run seen the development of a few structures. The main engineering highlight which features this style is the segment put on the façade. The recognizable elements of old style stylish incorporate evenness, extent, reasonable request, the relationship of individual parts to the entire and quiet rationale.
700 to 323 BCE — Greek: The Doric segment was first evolved in Greece and it was utilized for extraordinary sanctuaries, remembering the popular Parthenon for Athens. Straightforward Ionic segments were utilized for more modest sanctuaries and building insides. 323 to 146 BCE — Greek: When Greece was at the level of its power in Europe and Asia, the realm assembled elaborate sanctuaries and common structures with Ionic and Corinthian sections. The Greek time frame finished with victories by the Roman Domain. 44 BCE to 476 CE — Roman: The Romans acquired vigorously from the prior Greek and Greek styles, however their structures were all the more exceptionally ornamented. They utilized Corinthian and composite style sections alongside enhancing sections. The development of cement permitted the Romans to fabricate curves, vaults, and arches. Renowned instances of Roman engineering remember the Roman Colosseum and the Pantheon for Rome. Quite a bit of this old design is in ruins or somewhat revamped. Computer generated reality programs like Romereborn.org endeavor to reproduce the climate of this significant development carefully

History of architecture

History of architecture

Ancient Egyptian Architecture (3500 BCE to 900 AD ):-

This engineering style goes from 3500 BC to 900 Promotion. It portrays the noticeable time of Egyptian engineering.
The Egyptians made the most great designs of the old world. The period saw the development of a portion of the unmistakable pyramids with a few recognizable compositional qualities.
Wood was not broadly accessible in the parched Egyptian scene. Houses in antiquated Egypt were made with blocks of sun-prepared mud.
Flooding of the Nile Stream and the attacks of time obliterated the greater part of these old homes. A lot of what we realize about old Egypt depends on incredible sanctuaries and burial chambers, which were made with stone and limestone and enhanced with hieroglyphics, carvings, and brilliantly shaded frescoes. The old Egyptians didn’t utilize mortar, so the stones were painstakingly sliced to fit together.

History of architecture

History of architecture

Prehistoric Architecture:-

Ancient manufacturers moved earth and stone into mathematical structures, making our earliest human-made developments. People developed earthen hills, stone circles, stone monuments, and designs
Göbekli Tepe in present day Turkey is a genuine illustration of archeological engineering. Before written history, people developed earthen hills, stone circles, stone monuments, and designs that frequently puzzle advanced archeologists. Ancient Engineering Incorporates stupendous designs like Stonehenge, precipice abodes in the Americas, and cover and mud structures.
Many fine instances of all around safeguarded ancient design are tracked down in southern Britain. Stonehenge in Amesbury, Joined Realm is a notable illustration of the ancient stone circle.

History of architecture

History of architecture

 

Our other social links

Instagram 

other blogs and works

construction-materials

Vaastu-shastra

 

 

GREEK ARCHITECTURE

Greek Architecture is concerned with simplicity, proportion, perspective, and harmony in buildings. Greek architecture includes some of the finest and most distinctive buildings ever built. Examples of Greek architecture include temples, theatres, and stadia, all of which become common features of towns and cities from antiquity onwards.

Greek architects would go on to greatly influence architects in the Hellenistic period and in the Roman world, providing the foundation for the classical architectural orders which would dominate the western world from the Renaissance to the present day.

The Classical Architectural Orders:-

There are five orders of classical architecture – Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, Tuscan, and Composite – all named as such in later Roman times. Greek architects created the first three and hugely influenced the latter two which were composites rather than genuine innovations. An order, properly speaking, is a combination of a certain style of column with or without a base and an entablature (what the column supports: the architrave, frieze, and cornice). The earlier use of wooden pillars eventually evolved into the Doric column in stone. This was a vertical fluted column shaft, thinner at its top, with no base and a simple capital below a square abacus. The entablature frieze carried alternating triglyphs and metopes. The Ionic order, with origins in mid-6th century BCE Asia Minor, added a base and volute, or scroll capital, to a slimmer, straighter column. The Ionic entablature often carries a frieze with richly carved sculpture. The Corinthian column, invented in Athens in the 5th century BCE, is similar to the Ionic but topped by a more decorative capital of stylized acanthus and fern leaves. These orders became the basic grammar of western architecture and it is difficult to walk in any modern city and not see examples of them in one form or another.

What Materials did Greek Architects Use?

The Greeks certainly had a preference for marble, at least for their public buildings. Initially, though, wood would have been used for not only such basic architectural elements as columns but the entire buildings themselves. Early 8th century BCE temples were so constructed and had thatch roofs. From the late 7th century BCE, temples, in particular, slowly began to be converted into more durable stone edifices; some even had a mix of the two materials. Some scholars have argued that certain decorative features of stone column capitals and elements of the entablature evolved from the skills of the carpenter displayed in more ancient, wooden architectural elements.

                          

The stone of choice was either limestone protected by a layer of marble dust stucco or even better, pure white marble. Also, carved stone was often polished with chamois to provide resistance to water and give a bright finish. The best marble came from Naxos, Paros, and Mt. Pentelicon near Athens.

Temples, Treasuries & Stoas:-

The ancient Greeks are rightly famous for their magnificent Doric and Ionic temples, and the example par excellence is undoubtedly the Parthenon of Athens. Built in the mid 5th century BCE in order to house the gigantic statue of Athena and to advertise to the world the glory of Athens, it still stands majestically on the city’s acropolis. Other celebrated examples are the massive Doric Temple of Zeus at Olympia (completed c. 460 BCE), the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus (completed c. 430 BCE), which was considered one of the wonders of the ancient world, and the evocative Temple of Poseidon at Sounion (444-440 BCE), perched on the cliffs overlooking the Aegean. The latter is illustrative of the Greek desire that such public buildings should not just fulfil their typical function of housing a statue of a Greek deity, and not only should they be admired from close-up or from the inside, but also that they should be admired from afar. A great deal of effort was made to build temples in prominent positions and, using sophisticated geometry, architects included optical ‘tricks’ such as thickening the lower parts of columns, thickening corner columns, and having columns ever so slightly lean inwards so that from a distance the building seemed perfectly straight and in harmony. Many of these refinements are invisible to the naked eye, and even today only sophisticated measuring devices can detect the minute differences in angles and dimensions. Such refinements of architectural style indicate that Greek temples were, therefore, not only functional structures but also that the building itself, as a whole, was symbolic and an important element in the civic landscape.
Greek temples, at least on the mainland, followed a remarkably similar plan and almost all were rectangular and peripteral, that is their exterior sides and façades consisted of rows of columns. Notable exceptions included the magnificently eccentric Erechtheion of Athens with its innovative Caryatid columns and the temples of the Cyclades which, although still Doric, only had columns on the front façade (prostyle), which was often wider than the length of the building. So too, temples from Ionia tended to differ from the norm, usually having a double colonnade (dipteral). However, returning to the standard Greek temple layout, the rectangular peristyle of columns (8 x 17 in the case of the Parthenon, 6 x 13 for the temple of Zeus at Olympia) surrounded an inner chamber or cella with the whole standing on a stepped platform or stylobate and the interior paved with rectangular slabs. The roof was usually raised along a central ridge with a slope of approximately 15 degrees and was constructed from wooden beams and rafters covered in overlapping terracotta or marble tiles. Decorative acroteria (palms or statues) often stood at each point of the pediment. Finally, the doors to temples were made of wood (elm or cypress) and often decorated with bronze medallions and bosses.

                     

Many temples also carried architectural sculpture arranged to tell a narrative. Pediments, friezes, and metopes all carried sculpture, often in the round or in high relief and always richly decorated (with paint and bronze additions), which retold stories from Greek mythology or great episodes in that particular city’s history.
Temples also indicate that Greek architects (architektones) were perfectly aware of the problems of providing stable foundations able to support large buildings. Correct water drainage and the use of continuous bases on foundations above various layers of fill material (conglomerate soft rocks, soil, marble chips, charcoal, and even sheepskins) allowed large Greek buildings to be built in the best positions regardless of terrain and to withstand the rigours of weather and earthquake over centuries. Indeed, absolute stability was essential, as even a slight settling or subsidence in any part of the building would render useless the optical refinements discussed above. It is remarkable that the vast majority of Greek buildings that have collapsed have done so only because of human intervention – removing blocks or metal fixtures for reuse elsewhere – weakening the overall structure. Structures not interfered with, such as the Temple of Hephaistos in the Athens agora, are testimony to the impressive durability of Greek buildings.

Other structures which were constructed near temples were monumental entrance gates (such as the Propylaia of Athens’ acropolis) and small buildings to house dedications, often from specific city-states. These very often borrowed architectural elements from the temple such as columned façades and friezes. An excellent example is the Treasury of the Athenians at Delphi (490 BCE).
The stoa was another structure common to many temple complexes from the 7th century BCE onwards. This was a long, narrow row of columns backed by a plain wall and roofed. Often placed at right-angles to create an enclosed open space, stoas were used for all manner of purposes such as meeting places and storage. The agora or market place of many ancient Greek towns would be composed of a large open square surrounded by a stoa. One unusual stoa is that of the Sicilian colony of Selinus. This was constructed between 580 and 570 BCE and was a trapezoid in shape. More interestingly, the nearby shops all present the same façade despite being different types of buildings. This is evidence that there was some sort of centrally controlled planning authority which ensured harmony of architecture in important public places. Certainly, during the 5th century BCE there were professional town planners, the most famous of which was Hippodamos who is often credited with planning the Piraeus and Rhodes. Interestingly, there is very often a correspondence between architectural changes in towns and changes in political regime. One final function of the stoa in Hellenistic times was in the gymnasium and palaistra complexes, notably at the great sanctuaries of Olympia, Delphi, and Nemea. These stoas were used to create an enclosed space for physical exercise and provide a practice area for such field events as the javelin and discus.
Temples, treasuries, and stoas then, with their various orders, arrangements of columns and architectural sculpture, have provided the most tangible architectural legacy from the Greek world, and it is perhaps ironic that the architecture of Greek religious buildings has been so widely adopted in the modern world for such secular buildings as courthouses and government buildings.

The Greek Theatre:-

Another distinctive contribution of Greek architecture to world culture was the amphitheatre. The oldest certain archaeological evidence of theatres dates from the late 6th century BCE but we may assume that Greeks gathered in specified public places much earlier. Indeed, Bronze Age Minoan sites such as Phaistos had large stepped-courts which are thought to have been used for spectacles such as religious processions and bull-leaping sports. Then from the late 6th century BCE we have a rectangular theatre-like structure from Thorikos in Attica which had a temple dedicated to Dionysos at one end. This would suggest it was used during Dionyistic festivals, at which dramas were often presented. However, it was from the 5th century BCE that the Greek amphitheatre took on its recognisable and most influential form. This was an open-air and approximately semi-circular arrangement of rising rows of seats (theotron) which provided excellent acoustics. The stage or orchestra was also semi-circular and backed by a screen or skene, which would become more and more monumental in the following centuries. Monumental arches often provided the entrances (paradoi) on either side of the stage.

                     

Examples abound throughout the Greek world and many theatres have survived remarkably well. One of the most celebrated is the theatre of Dionysus Eleutherius on the southern slope of Athens’ acropolis where the great plays of Sophocles, Euripedes, Aeschylus, and Aristophanes were first performed. One of the largest is the theatre of Argos which had a capacity for 20,000 spectators, and one of the best preserved is the theatre of Epidaurus which continues every summer to host major dramatic performances. Theatres were used not only for the presentation of plays but also hosted poetry recitals and musical competitions.

The Greek Stadium:-

Another lasting contribution of Greek architecture to world culture was the stadium. Stadiums were named after the distance (600 ancient feet or around 180 metres) of the foot-race they originally hosted – the stade or stadion. Initially constructed near natural embankments, stadia evolved into more sophisticated structures with rows of stone or even marble steps for seating which had divisions for ease of access. Conduits ran around the track to drain off excess rainfall and in Hellenistic times vaulted corridors provided a dramatic entrance for athletes and judges. Famous examples include those at Nemea and Olympia which had seating capacities of 30,000 and 45,000 spectators respectively.

Greek Domestic Architecture:-

Considering more modest structures, there were fountain houses (from the 6th century BCE) in many Greek cties where people could easily collect water and perhaps, as black-figure pottery scenes suggest, socialise. Regarding private homes, these were usually constructed with mud brick, had packed earth floors, and were built to no particular design. One- or two-storied houses were the norm. Later, from the 5th century BCE, better houses were built in stone, usually with plastered exterior and frescoed interior walls. Also, there was often no particular effort at town planning which usually resulted in a maze of narrow chaotic streets, even in such great cities as Athens. Colonies in Magna Graecia, as we have seen in Selinus, were something of an exception and often had more regular street plans, no doubt a benefit of constructing a town from scratch.

In conclusion then, we may say that ancient Greek architecture has provided not only many of the staple features of modern western architecture, but it has also given the world truly magnificent buildings which have literally stood the test of time and continue to inspire admiration and awe. Many of these buildings – the Parthenon, the Caryatid porch of the Erechtheion, the volute of an Ionic capital to name just three – have become the instantly recognisable and iconic symbols of ancient Greece.

WHAT IS ROMAN ARCHITECTURE

Roman Architecture continued the legacy left by Greek architects and the established architectural orders, especially the Corinthian. The Romans were also innovators and they combined new construction techniques and materials with creative design to produce a whole range of brand new architectural structures. Typical innovative Roman buildings included the basilica, triumphal arch, monumental aqueduct, amphitheatre, and residential housing block.

Many of the Roman architectural innovations were a response to the changing practical needs of Roman society, and these projects were all backed by a state apparatus which funded, organised, and spread them around the Roman world, guaranteeing their permanence so that many of these great edifices survive to the present day.

The Architectural Orders

Roman architects continued to follow the guidelines established by the classical orders the Greeks had first shaped: Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian. The Corinthian was particularly favoured and many Roman buildings, even into Late Antiquity, would have a particularly Greek look to them. The Romans did, however, add their own ideas and their version of the Corinthian capital became much more decorative, as did the cornice – see, for example, the Arch of Septimius Severus in Rome (203 CE). The Romans also created the composite capital which mixed the volute of the Ionic order with the acanthus leaves of the Corinthian. The Tuscan column was another adaptation of a traditional idea which was a form of Doric column but with a smaller capital, more slender shaft without flutes, and a moulded base. The Tuscan column (as it came to be known in the Renaissance period) was especially used in domestic architecture such as peristyles and verandahs. The Romans also favoured monolithic columns rather than the Greek approach of using several drums stacked on top of each other.

             

In addition, columns continued to be used even when they were no longer structurally necessary. This was to give buildings a traditional and familiar look, for example the front of the Pantheon (c. 125 CE) in Rome. Columns could be detached from the building yet remain attached to the façade at the base and entablature (free-standing columns); see, for example, Hadrian’s Library in Athens (132 CE). Finally, columns could become a part of the wall itself (engaged columns) and function as pure decoration, for example, the upper floors of the Colosseum exterior (last quarter 1st century CE).

Greek influence is also evidenced in the fact that late Republican innovation, such as the basilica and bath buildings, usually occurred first in the south of Italy in Campania (see especially Pompeii) which was closer to the long-established Greek colonies of Magna Graecia. It was from here that we have the oldest surviving dome building, the frigidarium (cold room) of the Stabian Baths at Pompeii (2nd century BCE). As with many other areas, the Romans took an idea and pushed it to its maximum possibility, and the huge imperial bath complexes incorporated soaring arches, arches springing directly from column capitals, and domes which spanned seemingly impossible distances.

The Augustan period saw a surge in building activity, innovation in design, and extravagant use of marble, symptoms of a Rome that was beginning to flex its muscles and with an increased confidence break away from the rigid tradition of earlier civilizations. This was also the time when increased imperial patronage allowed for ever bigger and more impressive building projects to be undertaken, not only in Rome itself but across the Empire, where buildings became propaganda for the might and perceived cultural superiority of the Roman world.

As the Empire expanded, ideas and even craftsmen became integrated into the Roman architectural industry, often following their familiar materials like marble to the sites of construction. The evidence of eastern influence can be seen in such features as papyrus leaves in capitals, sculptured pedestals, street colonnades, and the nymphaeum (ornamental fountain).

Materials & Techniques

The first all-marble building was the Temple of Jupiter Stator in Rome (146 BCE), but it was not until the Empire that the use of marble became more widespread and the stone of choice for the most impressive state-funded building projects. The most commonly used from Italy was Carrara (Luna) marble from Tuscany (see, for example, the 30 BCE Temple of Apollo on the Palatine). Marble was also readily available from across the empire; especially esteemed were the Parian marble of Paros in the Cyclades and Pentelic from Athens. Coloured varieties were also much favoured by Roman architects, for example, yellow Numidian marble from North Africa, purple Phyrgian from central Turkey, red porphyry from Egypt, and green-veined Carystian marble from Euboea. Foreign marble was, though, mainly reserved for use in columns and, due to the costs of transportation, imperial projects.

                                                

Besides marble, travertine white limestone was also made available from quarries near Tivoli, and its favourability towards precise carving and inherent load-bearing strength made it a favourite substitute for marble amongst Roman architects from the 1st century BCE. It was especially used for paving, door and window frames, and steps.

The Romans did not invent lime mortar but they were the first to see the full possibilities of using it to produce concrete. Concrete rubble had usually been reserved for use as a filler material but Roman architects realised that the material could support great weight and could, therefore, with a little imagination, be used to help span space and create a whole new set of building opportunities. They called this material opus caementicium from the stone aggregate (caementa) which was mixed with the lime mortar. The material had a thick consistency when prepared and so was laid not poured like modern concrete. The first documented evidence of its use is from 3rd century BCE Cosa and its first use in Rome seems to have been a 2nd century BCE warehouse. Also in the 2nd century BCE it was discovered that by using pozzolana (concrete made using volcanic sand, pulvis puteolanus), which had a high silica content, the concrete could set under water and was even stronger than normal concrete. By the 1st century BCE its use seems widespread in foundations, walls, and vaults. Perhaps the best example of its possibilities in construction is the Sanctuary of Fortuna Primigenia at Palestrina.In addition to the structural possibilities offered by concrete, the material was also a lot cheaper than solid stone and could be given a more presentable façade using stucco, marble veneer, or another relatively cheap material: fired brick or terracotta. Sun-dried mud bricks had been used for centuries and continued to be used for more modest projects up to the 1st century CE, but fired bricks had the advantage of durability and could be carved just like stone to resemble such standard architectural features as capitals and dentils.

Bricks were typically 59 cm square and 2.5-5 cm thick. Uncut they were used in roofing and drains, but for other uses they were usually cut into 18 triangles. There were also circular bricks, typically cut into quarters, which were used for columns. Bricks could also be used in domes such as that of the Temple of Asklepios Soter at Pergamon and even became a decorative feature themselves by using different coloured bricks (usually yellow and orange) and laid to create patterns.

Stucco was used to face brick walls and could be carved, like bricks could be, to reproduce the architectural decorations previously rendered only in stone. The stucco was made from a mix of sand, gypsum, and even marble dust in the best quality material.

Volcanic tufa and pumice were used in domes because of their light weight as in, for example, the Pantheon. Basalt was often used for paving and roads, laid as polygonal blocks, and Egyptian grey and pink granite was popular for obelisks and columns. Finally, terracotta was also used for moulded ornamentation on buildings and became a common embellishment of private homes and tombs.

Roman Architects

In the Roman world the credit for buildings was largely placed at the feet of the person who conceived and paid for the project rather than the architect who oversaw the realisation of it; therefore, he often remains anonymous. Those architects employed for specific projects by the emperor are better known. We know of Trajan’s favoured architect, Apollodorus of Damascus, famed for his skills in bridge building, for example, and who was responsible for, amongst other projects, Trajan’s Forum and Baths in Rome (104-9 CE). Severus and Celer were the architects responsible for the fantastic sounding revolving roof of Nero’s Golden House. In general, architects supervised whilst it was contractors (redemptores) who actually carried out the project based on the architect’s measured drawings.

Certainly, the most famous Roman architect is Vitruvius, principally because his On Architecture, a 10-volume study of architecture, has survived intact. We do not actually know much about his own work – only a basilica he constructed in Fano and that he did work for Julius Caesar and Augustus. On Architecture covers all facets of architecture, types of building, advice for would-be architects, and much more besides. One interesting point about the work is that it reveals that the ancient architect was expected to have many skills which nowadays would be separated into different specialisations. Vitruvius also encapsulated the essential ethos of Roman architecture: ‘All buildings must be executed in such a way as to take account of durability, utility and beauty.’ (On Architecture, Book I, Ch. III)

Key Roman Buildings

Aqueducts & Bridges – These sometimes massive structures, with single, double, or triple tiers of arches, were designed to carry fresh water to urban centres from sources sometimes many kilometres away. The earliest in Rome was the Aqua Appia (312 BCE), but the most impressive example is undoubtedly the Pont du Gard near Nimes (c. 14 CE). Roman bridges could make similar use of the arch to span rivers and ravines. Constructed with a flat wooden superstructure over stone piers or arches, examples still survive today. One of the best preserved is the granite Tagus Bridge at Alcantara (106 CE) which has arches spanning over 30 metres.

Basilicas – The basilica was adopted by the Christian church but was conceived by the Romans as a place for any large gathering, with the most common use being law courts. They were usually built along one side of the forum, the city’s marketplace, which was enclosed on all sides by colonnades. The basilica’s long hall and roof were supported by columns and piers on all sides. The columns created a central nave flanked on all sides by an aisle. A gallery ran around the first floor and later there was an apse at one or both ends. A typical example is the Severan Basilica at Lepcis Magna (216 CE).

Baths – Roman baths display the typical Roman ability for creating breath-taking interior space using arches, domes, vaults, and buttresses. The largest of these often huge complexes were built symmetrically along a single axis and included pools, cold and hot rooms, fountains, libraries, under-floor heating, and sometimes inter-wall heating through terracotta piping. Their exteriors were usually plain, but within they were often sumptuous with the lavish use of columns, marble, statues and mosaics. One of the finest and certainly best surviving examples is the Baths of Caracalla in Rome (completed 216 CE).

Private Homes – Perhaps more famous for their richly decorated interior walls using fresco and stucco, Roman private residences could also enchant with atrium, peristyles, gardens and fountains, all ordered in harmonious symmetry. For a typical example, see the House of the Vettii at Pompeii (1st century BCE – 79 CE).

Even more innovative, though, were the large apartment blocks (insula) for the less well-off city-dwellers. These were constructed using brick, concrete, and wood, sometimes had balconies, and there were often shops on the ground floor street front. Appearing as early as the 3rd century BCE, by the 1st century BCE examples could have 12 stories, but state-imposed height restrictions resulted in buildings averaging four to five stories (at least at the front side as there were no such restrictions for the rear of the building). Some of the very few surviving examples may be seen at Ostia.

Temples – The Roman temple was a combination of the Etruscan and Greek models with an inner cella at the rear of the building surrounded by columns and placed on a raised platform (up to 3.5 metres high) with a stepped entrance and columned porch, the focal point of the building (in contrast to Greek temples where all four sides could be equally important in the urban landscape). Surviving practically complete and a typical example is the Maison Carrée at Nimes (16 BCE). Temples were usually rectangular but could take other forms such as circular or polygonal, for example, the temple of Venus at Baalbeck (2nd-3rd century CE).

Theatres & Amphitheatres – The Roman theatre was of course inspired by the Greek version, but the orchestra was made semicircular and the whole made using stone. The Romans also added a highly decorative stage building (scaenae frons) which incorporated different levels of columns, projections, pediments, and statues such as is found in the theatre at Orange (27 BCE – 14 CE). A similar approach was taken with façades of libraries – see, for example, the Celsus Library in Ephesus (2nd century CE). Theatres also display the Roman passion for enclosing spaces, especially as they were often (partially or completely) roofed in wood or employed canvas awnings.

The fully enclosed amphitheatre was a particular favourite of the Romans. The Colosseum is the largest and most famous, and it is a typical example copied throughout the empire: a highly decorative exterior, seats set over a network of barrel vaults, and underground rooms below the arena floor to hide people, animals and props until they were needed in the spectacles.

Triumphal Arches – The triumphal arch, with a single, double, or triple entrance, had no practical function other than to commemorate in sculpture and inscription significant events such as military victories. Early examples stood over thoroughfares – the earliest being the two arches set up by L.Stertinius in Rome (196 BCE) – but later examples were often protected by steps. Topped by a bronze four-horse chariot, they became imposing stone monuments to Roman vanity. The Arch of Constantine (c. 315 CE) in Rome is the largest surviving example and is perhaps the last great monument of Imperial Rome.

Walls – Aside from the famous military structures such as the Antonine and Hadrian’s Wall (c. 142 CE and c. 122 CE respectively), even more modest Roman walls offer a surprising number of variations. The width of Roman walls could also vary tremendously from the thinnest at 18 cm to a massive 6 m thick. Rarely were marble and fine stone blocks used as this was too expensive. Large square blocks were used to create ashlar masonry walls, that is, close-fitting blocks without any use of mortar. Much more common was the use of brick (usually triangular shaped and set with mortar) and small stones facing a concrete mix core. The bricks and stones could be arranged in various ways:

opus incertum – first appeared in the 3rd century BCE and used small irregular chunks of stone smoothed on one side.

opus reticulatum – from the 2nd century BCE and used pyramid-shaped chunks with 6-12 cm square base and height of 8-14 cm. The stone was set with the base facing outwards and laid in diagonal arrangements.

opus mixtum – common from the 1st century CE, this was a combination of opus reticulatum with a layer (course) of horizontal brick every fourth course and at the edges of the wall.

opus testaceum – common from the 1st century CE and used courses of brick only.

opus vittatum – used an alternative course of brick with two courses of tufa blocks with a rectangular side facing outwards and diminishing in size towards the inner surface. It was especially popular from the 4th century CE across the Empire.

Despite the decorative effect of these various arrangements of stone and brick, most walls were actually covered both inside and out with white plaster stucco for protection against heat and rain for the outside and to provide a smooth surface for fine decorative wall painting on the inside.

Conclusion

Roman architecture, then, has provided us with magnificent structures that have, quite literally, stood the test of time. By combining a wide range of materials with daring designs, the Romans were able to push the boundaries of physics and turn architecture into an art form. The result was that architecture became an imperial tool to demonstrate to the world that Rome was culturally superior because only she had the wealth, skills, and audacity to produce such edifices. Even more significantly, the Roman use of concrete, brick, and arches twinned with building designs like the amphitheatre and basilica would immeasurably influence all following western architecture right up to the present day.

 

 

 

WHAT IS Sustainability, How to create a sustainable future, Theorizing OF sustainability

Sustainability, the long-term viability of a community, set of social institutions, or societal practice. In general, sustainability is understood as a form of intergenerational ethics in which the environmental and economic actions taken by present persons do not diminish the opportunities of future persons to enjoy similar levels of wealth, utility, or welfare.

The idea of sustainability rose to prominence with the modern environmental movement, which rebuked the unsustainable character of contemporary societies where patterns of resource use, growth, and consumption threatened the integrity of ecosystems and the well-being of future generations. Sustainability is presented as an alternative to short-term, myopic, and wasteful behaviours. It can serve as a standard against which existing institutions are to be judged and as an objective toward which society should move. Sustainability also implies an interrogation of existing modes of social organization to determine the extent to which they encourage destructive practices as well as a conscious effort to transform the status quo so as to promote the development of more-sustainable activities.

Forms of sustainability:-

Sustainability is at the core of concepts such as sustainable yield, sustainable society, and sustainable development. The term sustainable yield refers to the harvest of a specific (self-renewing) natural resource—for example, timber or fish. Such a yield is one that can in principle be maintained indefinitely because it can be supported by the regenerative capacities of the underlying natural system. A sustainable society is one that has learned to live within the boundaries established by ecological limits. It can be maintained as a collective and ongoing entity because practices that imposed excessive burdens upon the environment have been reformed or abolished. Sustainable development is a process of social advancement that accommodates the needs of current and future generations and that successfully integrates economic, social, and environmental considerations in decision making.

In contemporary debate, sustainability often serves as a synonym for sustainable development. On other occasions, it is associated more exclusively with environmental constraints or environmental performance, and the expression environmental sustainability is used to emphasize that point. Parallel references can be found to the terms social sustainability, economic sustainability, and cultural sustainability, which allude to threats to long-term well-being in each of those domains. Local sustainability emphasizes the importance of place. Corporate sustainability is another common usage, which relates both to the survivability of the individual corporation and to the contribution that corporations can make to the broader sustainability agenda. Central here is the notion of the so-called triple bottom line—that businesses should pay attention to social performance and environmental performance as well as to financial returns. The notion of corporate sustainability is also connected to debates about reforming corporate governance, encouraging corporate responsibility, and designing alternative (sustainable, green, or ethical) investment vehicles.

How to create a sustainable future:-

While numerous practices are cited as threats to sustainability, such as political corruption, social inequality, the arms race, and profligate government expenditures, environmental issues remain at the heart of the discussion. Of course, what is conducive to environmental sustainability remains a matter of intense debate. Approaches range from a moderate “greening” of current social institutions to a radical transformation of the global political and economic order. A gradual adjustment toward sustainability relies on governmental initiatives to orient production and consumption into less environmentally destructive channels. That implies a reengineering of industrial and agricultural processes, a transformation of land-use practices, and a shift in household consumption. Potentially renewable resources should be managed to conserve their long-term viability; nonrenewable resources should be extracted at rates that allow an ordered transition to alternatives; emission of waste and toxic substances must remain within the assimilative capacities of natural systems; and more-vigorous measures must be taken to preserve species, habitats, and ecosystems. Managing long-term environmental issues such as climate change and the loss of biodiversity is of critical importance to efforts to achieve sustainability.

Governments can deploy an array of policy tools to effect such changes, including regulation, fiscal instruments, negotiated agreements, and informational tools. Yet many problems resist solution because the offending (unsustainable) practices are often linked to deeply entrenched practices and constraints and supported by established definitions of values and interests.

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content:-

There are also a number of radical takes on sustainability. For some environmentalists, true sustainability is possible only in small-scale communities, where humans can live in close contact with natural processes and rhythms. According to that view, the catastrophic practices of industrial civilization must give way to a different mode of living where humans “walk lightly” on the planet, harmonizing their activities with natural cycles. While other radical environmentalists may accept a high-tech postindustrial civilization, for them too there must be a clear break with existing economic practices and power structures.

Theorizing sustainability:-

Discussion of sustainability within academia has ranged across many perspectives. Economic analysts have sometimes defined the concept in terms of nondeclining per capita income flows over time, or long-term economic growth, with minimal environmental impacts and debated how to maintain the capital endowments needed to sustain those income flows. Controversy over the substitutability of natural and human-made capital has divided proponents of weak and strong sustainability: the former argue that the two types of capital are largely interchangeable, whereas the latter insist that natural capital is increasingly the scarcest factor of production. In addition, ecosystem services, such as the provision of clean water or crop pollination, are often undervalued aspects of natural capital that should be incorporated into economic discussions of sustainability.

Ecologists and systems theorists have tended to approach sustainability in terms of physical interdependencies, energy flows, and population dynamics. They have emphasized the design features that suit social systems for long-term survival, including robustness, resiliency, redundancy, and adaptability. For their part, political analysts have focused on the ideological and normative implications of sustainability, on the character of green political projects, and on the public policy implications.

Islamic Architecture

Islamic Architecture, building traditions of Muslim populations of the Middle East and elsewhere from the 7th century on. Islamic architecture finds its highest expression in religious buildings such as the mosque and madrasah. Early Islamic religious architecture, exemplified by Jerusalem’s Dome of the Rock (AD 691) and the Great Mosque (705) in Damascus, drew on Christian architectural features such as domes, columnar arches, and mosaics but also included large courts for congregational prayer and a mihrab. From early times, the characteristic semicircular horseshoe arch and rich, nonrepresentational decoration of surfaces were employed. Religious architecture came into its own with the creation of the hypostyle mosque (see hypostyle hall) in Iraq and Egypt. In Iran a mosque plan consisting of four eyvans (vaulted halls) opening onto a central court was used. These brick-built mosques also incorporated domes and decorated squinches (see Byzantine architecture) across the corners of the rooms. Persian architectural features spread to India, where they are found in the Taj Mahal and Mughal palaces. Ottoman architecture, derived from Islamic and Byzantine traditions, is exemplified by the Selimiye Mosque (1575) at Edirne, Tur., with its great central dome and slender minarets. One of the greatest examples of secular Islamic architecture is the Alhambra. For full treatment of the subject, see Islamic arts.